Look at the CO₂ chart. Which transport is the best for the planet? Which is the worst? Use comparatives: "The bike is much cleaner than the car."
Use the data on the cards to prepare your debate arguments. Note at least 2 facts for your side!
Watch one or both videos. While watching, note at least 2 new arguments or facts you can use in today's debate. Share your notes with your group afterwards.
These phrases are essential for the debate. Click each one to see a full example sentence.
After watching, ask: "What new facts did you find? Can you use them in the debate?" Ensure students have noted the opinion phrases before moving to the debate stage. Model one example yourself: "Having watched the video, I would argue that investing in public transport is not just good for the environment — it is essential for social equality."
Step 1: Use the Argument Builder to prepare 3 arguments per side. Step 2: Each group presents — 1 minute per argument. Step 3: Respond to the opposing side. Step 4: Class votes for best argument!
Divide the class into two groups and assign positions. Groups prepare 3 arguments using the builder (7–8 min). Then run the debate: each group presents one argument, the other group responds, then the audience votes for the stronger argument. Award points on the scoreboard. After the debate, reveal the eco-truth: public transport is objectively better for the planet, even if cars are more convenient.
Even if you personally disagree with your assigned position, argue it as strongly as possible! Use the language: "I would argue that... because..." / "Although cars are convenient, they are far more polluting." / "The evidence shows that public transport emits much less CO₂."
Click the UP/DOWN arrows to rank transport modes from most eco-friendly (#1) to least eco-friendly. Then click Check Ranking to see if you're right — and justify each position aloud!
In my opinion, the best transport for Balıkesir is the bus. I believe this because it is greener than private cars and more affordable for most people.
Firstly, a bus produces significantly less CO₂ than a petrol car per passenger. For example, a bus emits only around 89g per kilometre per person, while a car emits 170g. Therefore, if more people used buses instead of cars, our city's air quality would improve dramatically.
In addition, buses are more practical than cars in city centres because they reduce congestion on roads. Although cars are more convenient for long distances, buses are a far better choice for daily urban travel.
To sum up, I strongly believe that investing in better bus services is the most sensible choice for our city. Our local government should improve bus frequency so that everyone can travel sustainably.
✅ Speaking: opinion phrases used correctly in debate? Comparatives accurate?
✅ Listening: students noted arguments/evidence from video for use in debate?
✅ Debate: clear argument structure? Evidence provided? Responded to opposing side?
✅ Essay: opinion + 2 arguments + conclusion? Comparatives + opinion phrases + modals? 120 words?
✅ Self-reflection: students can distinguish between convenience and eco-friendliness.