PROJECT NO: 2024-1-TR01-KA220-SCH-000245616
"EcoLingua Curriculum: Digitally Enhanced Pedagogy for Integrating Environmental Issues into Language Teaching"
๐ŸŒฟ Digital Activity designed by the EcoLingua Project Team  ยท  Partner Institution: GAUN, Turkey
CEFR B2 B2 Level Activity 3 ๐ŸŒ SDG 7 ยท SDG 13 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท GAUN
โšก
โšก The Future of Energy: Renewable vs. Non-Renewable
GAUN, Turkey ยท B2 Level Activity 3 ยท Critical Debate ยท Persuasive Language
B2 Debate ยท Persuasion ยท Counterargument ~55 min ๐ŸŒ SDG 7
โฌ† CEFR B2 โ€” Structured Debate ยท Counterargument ยท Position Essay
โšก The Future of Energy:
Renewable vs. Non-Renewable
Compare energy sources ยท Build structured arguments ยท Debate with counterarguments ยท Write a position essay
โ˜€๏ธ Pro-Renewable: Cleaner, cheaper, sustainable โšก VS โ›ฝ Pro-Fossil: Reliable, established, energy-dense
๐ŸŽฎ How to Apply the Activity โ€” Teacher Guide
1
Set up: B2 debate activity (~55 min) from GAUN. Core B2 language: persuasive structures (It is clear that / On the other hand / Admittedly / Whereas), complex comparatives (considerably cleaner / far less reliable / the most cost-effective), counterargument structures. Display on projector.
2
COโ‚‚ Chart: Click Animate Chart to reveal energy source COโ‚‚ figures. Students compare analytically. B2 model: "Coal emits considerably more COโ‚‚ per kWh than solar, which strongly suggests that the transition to renewables is both environmentally and economically compelling."
3
Energy Flip Cards: Click cards to reveal B2 data on each energy source. Students note strengths and weaknesses. Essential preparation for the debate. Encourage note-taking: "This fact could support our counterargument."
4
Reading + Video: B2 reading text on energy transition with inline annotations. Video links to IEA and UN Energy resources. Post-viewing questions require structured B2 argument language including concession structures.
5
Debate Builder: Groups choose a position (Pro-Renewable or Pro-Fossil). Build arguments using the three-tier chip system: persuasive opener + argument + evidence/conditional. Click Add Counterargument to practice concession structures ("Admittedly X, however Y").
6
Debate + Scoreboard: Run the structured debate. Award points for well-argued contributions, correct use of B2 persuasive structures, and effective counterarguments. The live scoreboard drives competitive engagement.
7
Energy Ranking + Debate Bingo: Students rank energy sources eco-friendliest to worst using โ†‘โ†“ arrows. Debate Bingo: tick B2 debate phrases as they are used during the discussion. Full house = Debate Champion!
8
Essay: The Homework tab displays the 200-word position essay scaffold for "Renewables are the only future for energy. Do you agree or disagree?" The model essay demonstrates a balanced position with B2 concession and qualification language.
โฑ Estimated time: ~55 minutes. B2 Activity 3 is the most debate-intensive portal in the series. Key B2 language: persuasive structures (It is clear that / It is beyond dispute that / The evidence unequivocally demonstrates), concession structures (Admittedly / While it is true that X, it should nevertheless be noted that Y / One might argue X; however Y), formal comparatives (considerably cleaner / substantially more cost-effective / far less environmentally damaging), conditionals (If governments were to invest in renewables at scale, the cost of solar would fall further still). The counterargument structure is the core B2 addition that distinguishes this from B1 debate activities.
โฑ 5:00
STAGE
B2 ยท Debate Persuasive Concession Counterargument SDG 7 ยท SDG 13 ยท Renewable vs. Non-Renewable ยท Position Essay
๐Ÿ—ฃ Language Objectives
Persuasive structures ยท Concession (Admittedly/Whereas) ยท Structured counterargument ยท Formal comparatives ยท Conditionals
๐ŸŒ Eco Objectives
Evaluate energy sources critically ยท Reflect on climate-energy link ยท Analyse energy transition evidence
๐ŸŽฏ Skills
Speaking ยท Reading ยท Listening ยท Writing โ€” all four at B2 debate level
๐Ÿ“Š Warm-up โ€” COโ‚‚ per kWh by Energy Source (10 min)
Method: Visual inquiry ยท CLILB2: Formal comparatives ยท Evidence-based analysis

Study the chart. Use B2 comparative language: "Coal emits considerably more COโ‚‚ per kWh than wind, which strongly suggests that the decarbonisation argument for renewables is substantially stronger."

โšก COโ‚‚ Emissions per kWh of Electricity Generated (Lifecycle Analysis)
grams COโ‚‚ equivalent per kWh ยท source: IPCC 2022 / IEA
๐ŸŒฌ Wind (onshore)
~7g COโ‚‚/kWh โœ… Best
โ˜€๏ธ Solar PV
~45g COโ‚‚/kWh โœ…
๐Ÿ’ง Hydropower
~24g COโ‚‚/kWh โœ…
โ˜ข๏ธ Nuclear
~12g COโ‚‚/kWh โœ…
๐Ÿ”ฅ Natural gas
~490g COโ‚‚/kWh โŒ
๐Ÿ›ข Oil
~650g COโ‚‚/kWh โŒ
โ› Coal
~820g COโ‚‚/kWh โŒ Worst
๐Ÿƒ Energy Source Fact Cards โ€” Click to Flip!
Click each card to reveal B2 dataB2: Identify advantages and disadvantages

For each card, note: (1) the strongest argument FOR this energy source, (2) the most significant counterargument AGAINST it.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Warm-up Discussion
โ˜€๏ธ
"Is the cost argument for renewables now stronger than the environmental argument?"
โœ… B2: "It is clear that both arguments are now compelling. Whereas solar was once prohibitively expensive, costs have fallen by approximately 90% since 2010. Admittedly, there are still grid integration challenges, but the economic case for renewables is now arguably as strong as the environmental one."
โ›ฝ
"Can we justify continued fossil fuel investment during the energy transition?"
โœ… B2: "On the one hand, fossil fuels provide grid stability that current renewables cannot fully replicate. However, continued investment in fossil infrastructure creates stranded asset risk. The evidence suggests that investment should shift towards grid storage and interconnection rather than new fossil fuel extraction."
๐Ÿ“– Reading โ€” The Energy Transition: A B2 Analysis (10 min)
Method: CLIL ยท Critical reading๐Ÿ“– ReadingB2: ~250 words ยท Identify argument structures

Read the text and identify: (1) the main argument, (2) the concession made by the author, (3) three B2 persuasive phrases.

๐Ÿ“– Energy Transition AnalysisB2 ยท ~250 wordsAdapted for EcoLingua B2 ยท GAUN ยท Activity 3

The global energy transition โ€” the structural shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy โ€” is no longer merely an environmental aspiration; it has become an economic and strategic imperative. It is clear that the cost trajectory of solar and wind power has transformed the energy landscape fundamentally: the average cost of utility-scale solar has fallen by approximately 90% since 2010, making it the cheapest source of new electricity generation in history in most markets.

Admittedly, renewables present significant challenges. Their intermittent nature โ€” the fact that solar panels do not generate power at night and wind turbines produce nothing when the wind does not blow โ€” creates genuine grid stability challenges. Furthermore, the manufacturing of solar panels and batteries requires rare minerals, raising valid concerns about supply chain sustainability and environmental impact. These concerns are legitimate; however, they are engineering challenges, not fundamental objections โ€” and the pace of technological innovation suggests they will be resolved.

The evidence unequivocally demonstrates that continued dependence on fossil fuels is neither environmentally nor economically sustainable. Coal plants built today risk becoming stranded assets within a decade as renewable costs continue to fall. If governments were to redirect the approximately $5.9 trillion in annual global fossil fuel subsidies towards renewable energy infrastructure, the energy transition could be substantially accelerated.

๐ŸŽฌ Video โ€” Energy Transition & Clean Energy Future
Watch and note arguments for both sides of today's debate.
โšก IEA โ€” Clean Energy Transitions ๐ŸŒ UN Environment โ€” Energy Transition
Open in new tabs. Students take notes for the debate builder.
โš”๏ธ Structured Debate โ€” Renewable vs. Non-Renewable (20 min)
Method: Debate Pedagogy (Bygate, 1987)B2: Persuasion + concession + counterargument๐Ÿ—ฃ Speaking

Step 1: Build 3โ€“4 arguments per side using the Argument Builder below. Step 2: Add at least one counterargument per side. Step 3: Run the structured debate โ€” 1 argument per side per round. Step 4: Award points!

โš”๏ธ ARGUMENT & COUNTERARGUMENT BUILDER
Select your position, build your argument or counterargument, then add to your side.
โ‘  B2 Persuasive Opening Phrase:
โ‘ก Core Argument:
โ‘ข Evidence / Conditional:
Select your position, then build your argumentโ€ฆ
โ˜€๏ธ Pro-Renewable Arguments
Build and add arguments aboveโ€ฆ
VS
โ›ฝ Pro-Fossil Arguments
Build and add arguments aboveโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ† LIVE DEBATE SCORE
โ˜€๏ธ Pro-Renewable Team
0
points
VS
โ›ฝ Pro-Fossil Team
0
points
Start debating and award points!
+1 clear argument ยท +1 effective counterargument ยท +1 bonus for correct B2 concession structure
๐Ÿ’ฌ Post-Debate Reflection
๐ŸŒ
"What energy future do you want for Turkey? Why?"
โœ… B2: "Turkey has enormous solar and wind potential โ€” approximately 2,900 hours of sunshine per year and a coastline ideal for offshore wind. It is clear that accelerating the renewable transition is not only environmentally necessary but also strategically advantageous, as it would reduce Turkey's energy import dependency significantly."
โš–๏ธ
"Was there any argument from the opposing side that you found genuinely convincing?"
โœ… B2 concession model: "Admittedly, the grid reliability argument is legitimate โ€” intermittency is a real technical challenge. However, I would argue that advances in battery storage and smart grid technology are rapidly resolving this challenge, and it would therefore be premature to cite intermittency as a decisive argument against renewable energy."
๐ŸŽฎ Energy Ranking Challenge + Debate Bingo (10 min)
Method: GamificationB2: Justify rankings with evidence
โšก ENERGY RANKING CHALLENGE
Rank energy sources from cleanest (#1) to most polluting (#7). Justify each rank with a B2 comparative sentence!
Rank them, then click Check!
๐ŸŽฒ ENERGY DEBATE BINGO
During the debate, tick each phrase when you hear a classmate use it. Full row = Bingo! All 16 = Debate Champion! ๐Ÿ†
Heard: 0 / 16 โ€” Tick phrases as classmates use them!
โœ๏ธ Homework Position Essay โ€” 200 Words
"Renewables are the only viable future for energy. To what extent do you agree?"
Introduction โ€” State Your Position
It is widely acknowledged that the global energy system is undergoing . It is my contention that , although this position requires rather than .
Main Argument โ€” For Renewables
The evidence is compelling: the cost of solar has fallen by since 2010, making it . Furthermore, if governments were to , global emissions would fall substantially. It is clear that .
Concession + Rebuttal โ€” Acknowledging Challenges
Admittedly, renewables present challenges โ€” in particular. However, it should be noted that . Whereas fossil fuels offer , they impose that are far less sustainable in the long term.
Conclusion โ€” Qualified Agreement
In conclusion, I largely agree that renewables represent the only viable long-term energy future, although a managed transition is preferable to abrupt elimination of fossil fuels. Unless , the pace of change will be insufficient. The evidence strongly suggests that .
Admittedly / Whereas / In contrast / Nevertheless It is clear that / The evidence demonstrates considerably / substantially / far more / significantly If governments were to / Unless X, Y will
Renewables Are the Only Viable Future for Energy

It is widely acknowledged that the global energy system is undergoing an unprecedented structural transformation. It is my contention that renewables represent the only viable long-term energy future, although this position requires nuanced qualification rather than absolute advocacy.

The evidence is compelling: the cost of solar has fallen by approximately 90% since 2010, making it the cheapest source of new electricity generation in most markets. Furthermore, if governments were to redirect fossil fuel subsidies towards renewable infrastructure, global emissions would fall substantially within a decade. It is clear that the economic case for renewables now rivals โ€” and in many contexts, surpasses โ€” the environmental case.

Admittedly, renewables present challenges โ€” intermittency in particular. However, it should be noted that battery storage costs are falling rapidly and grid interconnection is improving. Whereas fossil fuels offer energy density and dispatchability, they impose carbon costs that are far less sustainable in the long term.

In conclusion, I largely agree that renewables represent the only viable future, although a managed transition is preferable to abrupt fossil fuel elimination. Unless investment accelerates significantly, the pace of change will be insufficient. The evidence strongly suggests that the question is not whether to transition, but how quickly.
๐Ÿ“‹ Assessment Notes โ€” B2
๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿซ Teacher
โœ… Speaking: persuasive structures used? Arguments supported with data? Counterarguments structured correctly (Admittedly/However)?
โœ… Reading: analytical comprehension โ€” identifying argument/concession/evidence in text?
โœ… Ranking: justified with formal comparative language?
โœ… Bingo: engagement with debate language โ€” phrases ticked accurately?
โœ… Essay: 200 words? Correct persuasive structures + concession + conclusion?
๐Ÿซ School-wide energy debate๐ŸŒฑ Research local renewable projects